Vietnam has dealt historically with health as a valuable asset, a resource that was distributed in an
equal manner to all citizens through the development of a wide and inclusive grassroots health
network during the 1970s. Since then, the health system has developed -in parallel to the country's
economy and shifts in policy- from a free-for-all service of a rather low quality, to a system that is
now better regulated and has overall better quality, but is conditioned to user fees. Following the
liberalization and decentralization policy directions of the Vietnamese state that initiated in the late
1980s, health is now open to private sector activity and competitiveness while still under the general
control and power of the state. The impacts of these changes have been felt more and more recently
as a result of widening socio-economic gaps among the population, which reflect on the way health
services are being offered and accessed.
This paper reviews the literature and delineates the structure and organization of the health care and
health prevention delivery systems in Vietnam. Information is triangulated and enriched with
findings from the field, obtained through qualitative interviews with health officials, doctors and
citizens in rural and urban localities within the Mekong Delta. While examining the function of health
institutions, deficiencies are highlighted: (i) the state is not consistent in monitoring and ensuring the
regulatory compliance of public or private health service providers, (ii) financial autonomy in the
health sector, combined with the withdrawal of central support away from local health units, are
creating inequalities in access while not bettering the quality of offered services, (iii) rurality and
poverty are closely connected to each other and to restricted health access, either due to limited
existing specialized care facilities or the inability to pay for them. Based on secondary data, the paper
also presents the latest statuses of the main health indicators, which not only illustrate the general
improvements achieved, but also indicate the yet unreached goal of effective preventive medicine
that could sustainably control many prominent diseases and could further build better understanding
around health in general.
Panagiota Kotsila
Full text: download